Outerbike Test Sessions: Orbea Occam
Editor’s Note: Mtbr welcomes longtime forum member Kent Robertson to the front page. Kent — or KRob — has been riding and evaluating bikes for two decades. This year, he and testing partner Ben Slabaugh headed to Moab, Utah, for the annual Outerbike consumer demo event where they rode as many bikes as possible. These posts are first ride impressions only — not full reviews. However, they stand by their opinions, and feel like they are good at feeling out the true identity, strengths, weaknesses, and soul of any given bike. For each session, they attempted to get set-up and suspension as dialed as possible. Test rides usually last 30-60 minutes. All bikes are then rated on a scale of 1-5 for visual impression/looks, climbing ability, descending, cornering, general agility, fit, and an intangible factor. Lowest possible score is 7. Highest is 35.
Check out the entire Outerbike Test Sessions archive and see all of Kent’s First Ride Reviews.
The Rallon, Orbea‘s 160mm travel 27.5 enduro bike, was actually on my list to test. But after riding three big bikes in a row I decided that a short-travel trail bike would be much more fun on the more XC-oriented Bar M Trails.
The tech at the Orbea tent recommended the 120mm travel Occam. Honestly, I didn’t know much about the Occam and I wasn’t expecting much from this 29er. But it did meet the criteria and looked sweet all dressed up in orange and dangled with some fairly spicy components. Venerable Shimano XT brakes and drivetrain did the heavy, while DT Swiss X1700 Spline aluminum wheels spun free and displayed little flex. Sharp lines, 148mm boost rear spacing, internal cable routing, and press fit bottom bracket rounded out the frame details.
Never been to Outerbike? Find out what this consumer demo event is all about.
I was immediately (and pleasantly) surprised by the Occam. The size large’s fit was spot on and pedal input was crisp yet still felt active enough to keep the rear wheel tracking the ground on bumpier terrain. The linkage activated single pivot with Fox Float Evol were well mated for the travel type and leverage ratio. The rear shock mounts high up parallel to the top tube leaving plenty of room for a water bottle (or two). The bar-stem combo was a year or two too narrow and long, but it didn’t adversely affect handling once I re-adapted.
For more information, read the Mtbr First Ride Review of the Orbea Occam.
Turn in was not sluggish at all and it loved to carve the faster more twisty North Forty trail. The 17.1″ chainstays kept things tight and responsive without giving up much in the way of straight line stability. The big wheels made it easy to keep momentum up. The Ardent front tire rolled well but isn’t my favorite for cornering grip. The new Forecaster rear tire by Maxxis did not distinguish itself in any bad ways. In fact, I didn’t notice anything about it all, which is usually a good thing. Also of note for being much better than most folks give it credit for was the Fox 32 Factory fork. If you start pushing into the more rowdy side of trail riding you may want to upgrade to the Fox 34, RockShox Pike, or MRP Stage. But it felt controlled, accurate, and plush on the small stuff during my ride.
Overall the Occam was high on my list of favorite bikes I rode this year. It was a bar, stem, and front tire away from being in my top two or three. So just because you may not be as familiar with this Spanish manufacturer, you should still give Orbea a look. I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised as I was.
Outerbike Test Session Score: 31 out of 35
For more information visit www.orbea.com.
The post Outerbike Test Sessions: Orbea Occam appeared first on Mountain Bike Review.